🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more allowing the radical right to set the political agenda, as per a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has unwittingly helped far-right groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Analysis Based on Two Decades of News Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of more than 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the far right shifted from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and immigration, mainstream parties increasingly adapted their communication in reaction.

This adjustment boosted the spread of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by established parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was evident even when conventional parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Phenomenon Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is probable to affect countries across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the radical right.

In a recent discussion, a then German chancellor called for widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable instances can be observed throughout Europe, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that would have been unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are talking about societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the essence of agenda setting," explained a researcher.

Some parties have gone one step further, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the far right, despite research indicates that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Voter Awareness

The scope of information gathered revealed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," stated a co-author. "But if you hear this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established parties, then of course this narrative travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Own Discourses

The research highlighted the necessity for established political parties to carve out their own narratives, especially on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be playing."